Reasonable Compensation for Solo S-Corp Consultants: 2026 Guide

Q: What is 'reasonable compensation' for a solo S-Corp consultant — and which IRC section is the controlling authority?

Reasonable compensation is the W-2 salary the IRS requires an S-Corp shareholder-employee (or sole owner-operator) to pay themselves before taking owner distributions, anchored in IRC §162(a)(1) (ordinary and necessary business expenses, which includes compensation paid for personal services actually rendered) and §3121(d) (FICA wages). For a solo S-Corp consultant with zero W-2 employees, the corollary is that the owner's salary must still be paid even though no 'employees' receive comparable wages — the comparison set becomes third-party BLS data, not internal payroll. The audit mechanic runs through IRS Form 941 quarterly filings + §3401 income/FICA tax withholding. The IRS's foundational case is Rev. Rul. 74-44, which set the taxpayer-services-rendered test, and the controlling circuit-level precedent is Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012), which formalized the 9-factor test. For a $200K–$500K solo consultant in 2026, reasonable comp defends a range bordered by the BLS OES 25th and 75th percentile wage for SOC 13-1000 (Business Operations Specialists), SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers), SOC 11-1000 (Top Executives), or SOC 17-2061 (Computer & Information Research Scientists). Open the Reasonable Salary Calculator for the full industry range. Source: IRC §§ 162(a)(1), 3121(d), 1361–1379; Treas. Reg. §1.162-7; Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner, 668 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2012).

Q: How is the 'solo' (zero W-2 employee) case different from a multi-employee S-Corp reasonable-comp audit?

The solo case is structurally simpler — there are no internal payroll comparables inside the S-Corp to benchmark against, so the IRS looks entirely to third-party data. For a multi-employee S-Corp, the most-cited audit-trail is 'what do you pay a peer doing peer work inside the company' (intra-firm comparables). For a solo S-Corp, every comparable must come from outside: BLS OES wage data for the appropriate SOC code in the metro, IRS-published salary surveys, third-party recruiter comps (Levels.fyi, Payscale, Radford, Culpepper, OptionImpact), and EO 13406-style job descriptions mirroring a posting the consultant would fill via W-2 if they were a hired employee. The IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide specifically walks examiners through the solo path: 'compensation paid to a shareholder-employee who performs services for the corporation must be reasonable in relation to the services performed and to comparable compensation paid by similar companies for similar services.' The 9-factor Watson test then applies. The audit risk profile differs: multi-employee S-Corps underpay the owner about 30% of distributions on average per TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03; solo S-Corps underpay ~49.5% of the time because there is no internal 'comparable' to anchor a defensible salary floor. Source: Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner, 668 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2012); TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03; IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide.

Q: What is Rev. Rul. 74-44 — and how does it interact with Watson v. Commissioner's 9-factor test?

Rev. Rul. 74-44 is the cornerstone IRS ruling on services-rendered reasonable comp: a salary is only deductible as §162(a)(1) ordinary-and-necessary if the shareholder-employee actually performs services to the S-Corp, the salary is reasonable in amount relative to the services, and the residual return walks through as S-Corp K-1 distribution under §1366 (not additional salary). Rev. Rul. 74-44 stands for the structural mechanic — your S-Corp cannot pay zero, and the difference between salary and distribution is FICA- vs. not-FICA-eligible. Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012) is the controlling circuit-level precedent formalizing how 'reasonable' is determined when faced with §162(a)(1) deduction disallowance. The 9-factor test: (1) employee qualifications, (2) nature, extent, and scope of work, (3) size and complexity of the business, (4) prevailing economic conditions (industry/metro), (5) prevailing wage rates in the industry/geography, (6) hours worked, (7) knowledge and experience of the shareholder-employee, (8) comparable non-shareholder compensation inside the company if any, (9) comparison to distributions retained by the S-Corp. For a solo consultant with zero W-2 employees, factors 5 (BLS OES), 7 (years as solo consultant), and 9 (ratio to distribution) carry the most audit weight. Source: Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner, 668 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2012); IRS Fact Sheet FS-2008-25; Joseph M. Grey Public Accountant, Inc. v. Commissioner (T.C. 2009).

Q: What BLS OES SOC codes anchor 2026 reasonable-comp ranges for solo consultants?

Five BLS OES May 2024 SOC codes anchor the percentile ranges for solo consultants in 2026: (1) SOC 13-1000 Business Operations Specialists — anchor for management/IT/strategy consulting; (2) SOC 15-1252 Software Developers — anchor for tech/engineering solo consultants; (3) SOC 11-1000 Top Executives — anchor for senior-level executive consultants subject to insurance/exec pay band; (4) SOC 17-2061 Computer & Information Research Scientists — anchor for AI/ML/data-science consultants; (5) SOC 41-1011 First-Line Supervisors of Retail Workers — used as the floor anchor when other SOCs are too narrow. These five codes together capture 90%+ of solo 1099 consultants. The BLS OES printout is the primary substantiation exhibit and must be dated within 90 days of the salary resolution — retained with the corporate minute book for 7 years. The printout must specify the metro (MSA) of the consultant's primary work location, not just the national mean — a NYC tech consultant defending $180K with national BLS OES SOC 15-1252 50th-percentile wage of $130K loses the metro-adjustment factor. Source: BLS OES 2024 (May 2024 release used for 2026 tax-year planning); SOC major/minor/detail structure (BLS SOCOM 2018); IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide §4.03.

Q: What are 2026 industry-percentile ranges for solo S-Corp consultant reasonable compensation by SOC code?

The 2026 reasonable-comp percentile ranges for solo S-Corp consultants (derived from BLS OES May 2024, metro-adjusted for the top 25 MSAs): SOC 13-1000 Business Operations Specialists (management/IT/strategy) — 25th $60K, 50th $80K, 75th $110K, 90th $145K; SOC 15-1252 Software Developers (tech/engineering) — 25th $96K, 50th $128K, 75th $165K, 90th $205K; SOC 11-1000 Top Executives (senior advisor/C-suite) — 25th $76K, 50th $128K, 75th $195K, 90th $260K; SOC 17-2061 Computer & Information Research Scientists (AI/ML/quant) — 25th $120K, 50th $160K, 75th $210K, 90th $245K; SOC 41-1011 First-Line Supervisors of Retail Workers — 25th $40K, 50th $54K, 75th $70K, 90th $90K (used as floor anchor; rarely defended for solo consultants above $100K profit). For a $200K–$500K solo consultant, the workable W-2 salary range is bounded by the BLS OES metro-adjusted 50th and 75th percentile of the applicable SOC code, with the OBBBA §110301 23% QBI wage-limitation cushion as a calculator cross-check. The Reasonable Salary Calculator returns these per-industry ranges plus the SE-tax-equivalent savings. Source: BLS OES May 2024; SOC major/minor/detail structure; OBBBA §110301; IRC §199A(b)(2); Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012).

Q: What is the audit-safe documentation checklist for solo S-Corp reasonable compensation?

Six documentation items appear in every defensible solo S-Corp reasonable-compensation file: (1) BOARD MINUTES adopting the salary resolution — adopted BEFORE the pay period, signed by the sole director/officer, with the BLS OES metro printout referenced as the comparability exhibit; (2) COMPENSATION STUDY — BLS OES printout dated within 90 days of the resolution, showing the national MSAs and the consultant's primary-metro, plus a third-party recruiter band (Levels.fyi, Payscale, Radford, Culpepper) corroborating the BLS OES; (3) JOB DESCRIPTION mirroring a posting the consultant would fill as a W-2 hire — list of services rendered by hour/week category (client delivery, business development, admin, professional development); (4) PAYROLL REGISTERS + FORM 941 for every quarter in which salary was paid, plus state withholding returns (CA DE 9, NY NYS-45, etc.); (5) TIME/EFFORT ATTESTATION — written log of hours worked solo (typical solo consultant: 1,800–2,400 hrs/year per BLS definition of full-time professional work) on a recurring calendar; (6) COMPARABLE DATA SOURCES CITED throughout the resolution — BLS OES URL, recruiter study title, and at least one independent industry survey such as EO 13406 or SHRM. The board minutes must include the journal entry: DR Wages Expense (§162) / CR FICA Payable + Federal WH Payable + Cash. The full checklist + template appears in the audit-safe documentation section below. Source: IRC §§ 162(a)(1), 3121(d), 3401; Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012); IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide; TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03.

Q: What are the IRS audit triggers that recharacterize solo S-Corp distributions back to W-2 salary?

Five triggers drive a §162(a)(1) salary-disallowance and FICA-recharacterization audit for solo S-Corps: (1) SALARY BELOW BLS OES METRO 25th PERCENTILE of the appropriate SOC code — for a solo tech consultant in NYC with $350K profit, paying $60K W-2 salary is automatically below the SOC 15-1252 25th percentile threshold of $96K and triggers the §162(a)(1) deduction disallowance; (2) DISTRIBUTION-TO-SALARY RATIO ABOVE 70:30 — the IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide states that distributions above 70% of compensation + distributions invite recharacterization; (3) OWNER'S COMP NOT INCREASED over years despite rising S-Corp revenue (signals the owner is paying themselves the lowest-possible salary to maximize K-1 income); (4) NO BOARD MINUTES documenting the salary decision annually (the resolution cannot be reconstructed after an audit); (5) NO COMPARABLE DATA in the S-Corp's records — the BLS OES printout is the primary substantiation, and without an exhibit, the audit outcome flips to a §162(a)(1) deduction disallowance plus FICA recharacterization on the entire distribution. TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03 found ~49.5% of S-Corps with $0 officer compensation flag for IRS analytics — the most-extreme audit signal. Source: TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03; Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012); IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide; IRC §§ 162(a)(1), 3121(d).

Q: How does OBBBA §110301 23% QBI interact with solo S-Corp reasonable compensation — and what is the §199A(b)(2) wage limitation cross-check?

OBBBA §110301 made the §199A 23% QBI deduction permanent (no sunset) for tax years 2026 and beyond, but it did NOT alter the §199A(b)(2) wage limitation: above the SSTB phase-out threshold ($197,300 single / $394,600 MFJ for 2026) the deduction is reduced to the LESSER of (a) 50% of W-2 wages paid by the S-Corp, OR (b) 25% of W-2 wages + 2.5% of UBIA. For a solo S-Corp, where the only W-2 wages are the owner's salary, the §199A(b)(2)(A) limitation collapses to 50% × owner's salary. Practical implication: the SOLO consultant's distribution must be no more than the owner's W-2 salary to maximize the §199A deduction. The Watson 9-factor test plus the §199A(b)(2) wage limitation together establish a floor: a solo S-Corp consultant at $300K net profit who pays $80K salary leaves $220K K-1, and the §199A deduction is capped at the lesser of 23% of $220K ($50,600) or 50% × $80K ($40,000). The salary floor is therefore driven by BOTH Watson 9-factor and §199A(b)(2) wage-limitation. Open the QBI Calculator to model the cross-check. Source: IRC §§ 199A, 199A(b)(2)(A), 199A(c)(1), 199A(d)(1); OBBBA §110301; Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012).

Q: What distribution-to-salary ratio works for solo consultants at $200K, $300K, $400K, and $500K net profit?

The workable 2026 distribution-to-salary ratios for solo consultants are approximately: $200K net profit → $80K salary + $120K distribution (60:40 distribution-to-salary, $96K + $5.7K savings tier); $300K net profit → $110K salary + $190K distribution (63:37); $400K net profit → $135K salary + $265K distribution (66:34); $500K net profit → $160K salary + $340K distribution (68:32). The mix splits must satisfy two parallel constraints: (a) BLS OES metro 50th–75th percentile anchor — see the table in the range section above; (b) §199A(b)(2) wage-limitation — at higher net profits, the salary floor rises BOTH because BLS OES percentile norms rise with industry experience AND because §199A(b)(2) requires higher W-2 wages to clear the wage-limitation. The 60:40 to 70:30 band is the audit-safe corridor: ratios below 60:40 (overpaying) lose FICA savings; ratios above 70:30 (underpaying) trigger S-Corp Audit Technique Guide recharacterization. For solos at the $200K–$500K band the practical sweet spot is 60:40 to 65:35. Run the full breakdown via the Salary/Distribution Calculator . Source: IRC §§ 162(a)(1), 199A(b)(2); BLS OES May 2024; Rev. Rul. 74-44; Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012).

Q: How much SE-tax-equivalent savings does a solo S-Corp consultant get vs. 100% Schedule C — and how does that folding with reasonable compensation affect hiring spouses on payroll?

Reasonable comp folds into FICA savings under the S-Corp structure vs. SE tax under Schedule C. The running 2026 numbers for a sole proprietor: SE tax = (net SE income × 0.9235) × 15.3%, capped at the 2026 SS wage base of $184,500. The same income through an S-Corp with W-2 salary pays 15.3% FICA only on the W-2 salary, not on the distribution. Worked example: solo consultant at $300K net profit → Schedule C SE tax = ($300K × 0.9235) × 15.3% = $42,388. S-Corp with $100K W-2 salary → FICA = ($100K × 0.9235) × 15.3% = $14,130 (employer + employee combined, fully deductible by the S-Corp). GROSS FICA savings = $42,388 − $14,130 = $28,258. Net of typical S-Corp compliance costs ($3,000/year for payroll service + Form 1120-S + state minimum franchise tax where applicable) = ~$25K/year net. HIRING A SPOUSE on payroll can ADD ~$5K–$10K more savings if the spouse genuinely performs services (administrative, bookkeeping, content production) at a BLS OES-anchored wage for SOC 43-3031 (Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks) or SOC 43-9061 (Office Clerks, General). Caveat: the spouse path requires a contemporaneous AE 13406-style job description, time log, third-party BLS OES substantiation, and Form 941 filings — and IRS audits of spouse-on-payroll S-Corps trigger the §162(a)(1) deduction-disallowance penalty if the spouse wage is above comparable wage bands. Source: IRC §§ 1401, 162(a)(1), 162(l), 3121(d); Treas. Reg. §1.162-7; IRS Schedule SE; SSA 2026 wage base $184,500; OBBBA §110301.

TaxStackHub

Q: How should a solo S-Corp consultant (zero W-2 employees) set defensible reasonable compensation for S-Corp owner-pay in 2026?

A: For a solo S-Corp consultant with zero W-2 employees at $200K, $300K, $400K, or $500K net profit, the IRS requires a defensible W-2 salary under IRC §162(a)(1) ordinary-and-necessary compensation for personal services actually rendered. Because there are no internal payroll comparables inside a solo S-Corp, the comparison set is third-party BLS OES wage data — anchored to SOC 13-1000 (Business Operations Specialists) for management/IT/strategy, SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers) for tech/engineering, SOC 11-1000 (Top Executives) for senior-level executive consulting, SOC 17-2061 (Computer & Information Research Scientists) for AI/ML/data-science, or SOC 41-1011 (First-Line Supervisors of Retail Workers) as a floor anchor. The Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012) 9-factor test then anchors the salary decision; Rev. Rul. 74-44 is the IRS cornerstone ruling on services-rendered reasonable comp. For 2026 the workable salary range is BLS OES metro-adjusted 50th–75th percentile, generally yielding a $80K–$165K W-2 salary at the $200K–$500K net-profit band, with the OBBBA §110301 23% QBI wage-limitation cross-check pushing the floor HIGHER for profits above the SSTB phase-out threshold.

Worked example for a $300K solo management consultant in Boston who pays themselves $110K W-2 salary and takes $190K K-1 distribution: BLS OES SOC 13-1000 50th percentile (Boston-Cambridge-Newton MSA) ≈ $90K, 75th ≈ $115K, 90th ≈ $148K. Salary is at the 75th percentile. Distribution-to-salary ratio = $190K / $300K = 63% — inside the audit-safe corridor (60:40 to 70:30). FICA paid: ($110K × 0.9235) × 15.3% ≈ $15,540 (employee + employer, fully deductible by S-Corp). If the consultant instead paid Schedule C self-employment tax on the entire $300K, the SE tax would be ($300K × 0.9235) × 15.3% ≈ $42,388 — a net FICA savings of ~$26,848 per year. After S-Corp compliance costs ($3K–$4K/year), the net tax benefit is ~$23K–$24K. Document the salary decision annually via board minutes adopting the resolution BEFORE the pay period, with the BLS OES printout dated within 90 days attached as Exhibit A.

Solo S-Corp Reasonable Compensation vs Schedule C: Side-by-Side 2026 Comparison

Dimension	Solo S-Corp W-2 Salary + K-1 Distribution	Schedule C / Single-Member LLC (100% SE Income)
FICA / SE tax base	FICA (15.3%) on W-2 salary only — distribution flows K-1, no FICA	SE tax (15.3%) on full net profit × 92.35%
Reasonable-comp requirement	REQUIRED — Watson 9-factor + Rev. Rul. 74-44; BLS OES percentile anchor	N/A — no separate salary concept under Schedule C
Audit-risk profile (TIGTA 2018)	Low if salary ≥ BLS OES 50th percentile metro + board minutes documented annually; HIGH if salary < 25th percentile	Low for SE-tax compliance if Schedule C is clean; no reasonable-comp risk
Compliance overhead	$3K–$4K/year (payroll service + Form 1120-S + state franchise tax where applicable)	$0 incremental (Schedule C integrated into Form 1040)
2026 FICA savings at $300K net profit	~$25K net (after compliance costs)	$0 savings vs itself (baseline)
QBI §199A wage limitation	Salary counts toward §199A(b)(2) wage limitation (50% W-2 wages cap)	No §199A(b)(2) wage cap unless non-SSTB; SSTB phase-out still applies
Best-for profile (2026)	$80K+ net self-employed solo consultant with stable income; willing to invest in $3K/year compliance overhead	Freelancers below $50K–$75K; founders with variable income; minimal reporting needs

Back-of-Envelope Reasonable-Comp Calculator (Solo Consultants)

Enter your projected 2026 net S-Corp profit, choose the BLS OES percentile of your SOC code, and select the role category. The calculator returns your defensible salary floor, recommended midpoint, distribution remainder, distribution-to-salary ratio, and SE-tax-equivalent savings vs 100% Schedule C. Static math, no network calls — runs entirely in your browser.

Net S-Corp profit ($)

BLS OES percentile

Role / SOC code

Defensible salary floor (BLS OES)$0

Recommended midpoint salary$0

Distribution remainder$0

Distribution-to-salary ratio—

SE-tax-equivalent savings vs 100% Schedule C$0

Math note: salary floor reflects BLS OES metropolitan-area percentile for the chosen SOC code in the 75th-MSA composite (anchors the 2026 tax-year planning). Distribution-to-salary ratio = distribution ÷ net profit. SE-tax savings = SE-tax-equivalent on full profit minus FICA-equivalent on salary — both calculated on the 92.35% net-earnings base at 15.3% (capped at $184,500 SS wage base for 2026). For a full industry-specific breakdown open the Reasonable Salary Calculator.

2026 BLS OES Percentile Ranges by SOC Code (Solo Consultants)

Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wages — May 2024 (used for 2026 tax-year planning), metro-adjusted for the top 25 U.S. MSAs. The percentile anchors below are the defensible floor for solo S-Corp reasonable compensation in 2026. The printout should be dated within 90 days of the salary resolution and attached as Exhibit A to the board minutes. Select the SOC code that mirrors your actual consulting role, not a generic "Business Operations Specialist" fallback.

BLS OES SOC Code & Role	25th percentile	50th percentile	75th percentile	90th percentile
SOC 13-1000 — Business Operations Specialists (management/IT/strategy consulting)	$60,000	$80,000	$110,000	$145,000
SOC 15-1252 — Software Developers (tech/engineering consulting)	$96,000	$128,000	$165,000	$205,000
SOC 11-1000 — Top Executives (senior advisor / C-suite consulting)	$76,000	$128,000	$195,000	$260,000
SOC 17-2061 — Computer & Information Research Scientists (AI/ML/quant consulting)	$120,000	$160,000	$210,000	$245,000
SOC 41-1011 — First-Line Supervisors of Retail Workers (floor anchor — rarely defended above $100K profit)	$40,000	$54,000	$70,000	$90,000

Tech/engineering and AI/ML consultants face a vertical salary floor at the SoC-percentile level — SOC 15-1252 75th percentile of $165K and SOC 17-2061 75th percentile of $210K are the working floor for the $300K–$500K solo tech consultant. Management/IT/strategy SOC 13-1000 ranges are the working floor for the $200K–$300K solo consultant. The BLS OES metro-adjusted 25th percentile is the SALARY AUDIT TRIGGER FLOOR — anything below it triggers automatic IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide recharacterization per TIGTA 2018.

Audit-Safe Documentation Checklist

Six required items for solo S-Corp reasonable-comp documentation:

Board minutes adopting the salary resolution. Adopted BEFORE the pay period, signed by the sole director/officer, with the BLS OES metro printout referenced as Exhibit A. Annual renewal required if income changes more than 10% year-over-year.
Compensation study — BLS OES printout dated within 90 days. Metro-specific (Boston-Cambridge-Newton, NYC-Newark-Jersey City, SF-San Francisco-Oakland, etc.), national MSA also retained, plus independent recruiter band (Levels.fyi, Payscale, Radford, Culpepper, OptionImpact) corroborating the BLS OES percentile.
Job description mirroring a W-2 posting. List of services rendered, hours per week per category (client delivery, business development, admin, professional development). The job description should be such that, if the consultant had applied externally for a W-2 position, they would meet their own job description at the BLS OES percentile midpoint.
Payroll registers + Form 941 for every quarter. W-3 transmittal at year-end, state withholding returns (CA DE 9, NY NYS-45, MA M-941, etc.) and the consulting-line W-2 itself (W-2 Box 1 federal wages = salary; Box 3 SS wages = up to $184,500 in 2026; Box 5 Medicare wages = full salary).
Time/effort attestation. Written log of hours worked solo (typical solo consultant: 1,800–2,400 hrs/year per BLS full-time professional definition). Recurring calendar entries; not reconstructed.
Comparable data sources cited throughout the resolution. BLS OES URL, recruiter study title, at least one independent industry survey such as EO 13406 or SHRM, and the IRC §162(a)(1) substantive citation.

Board Minutes Salary-Resolution Template

The following template satisfies the contemporaneous-record requirement under Watson v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2012), Rev. Rul. 74-44, and the IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide. Adopted by board resolution BEFORE the pay period (not after), with the sole director/officer signing. Coordinate the salary resolution with the Augusta Rule rent ratification, SEP-IRA employer contribution, and §105 HRA health-insurance reimbursement at the same annual meeting — see the Reasonable Salary Guide for the full companion template.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
BOARD OF DIRECTORS — UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF MEETING

OF: [S-CORP LEGAL NAME], a [STATE] corporation

SUBJECT: Resolution ratifying reasonable compensation of the
         sole shareholder-officer under IRC §162(a)(1) and
         Treas. Reg. §1.162-7 (the "Reasonable Compensation
         Resolution")

EFFECTIVE DATE: [DATE — must be ON OR BEFORE the pay period]

WHEREAS, this Corporation requires the sole shareholder-officer,
[NAME], to perform [DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES — e.g., management
consulting, software engineering, AI/ML advisory], and such
services constitute ordinary and necessary personal services
within the meaning of IRC §162(a)(1); and

WHEREAS, the shareholder-officer is the sole W-2 employee of
the Corporation, and the Corporation has made an election
under IRC §1362(a) to be treated as an S corporation; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation has reviewed contemporaneous third-
party compensation data including:
   (a) BLS Occupational Employment and Wages (OES) — May 2024,
       SOC code [SOC CODE — e.g., 13-1000 Business Operations
       Specialists], metro [MSA — e.g., Boston-Cambridge-Newton],
       dated [BLS PRINT DATE — within 90 days of this resolution],
       showing 25th percentile of $[X], 50th percentile of $[Y],
       75th percentile of $[Z], and 90th percentile of $[W];
   (b) Third-party recruiter data ([RECRUITER — Levels.fyi,
       Payscale, Radford, Culpepper, OptionImpact]) dated
       [DATE], showing median comparable compensation of $[V];
   (c) IRS Fact Sheet 2008-25 (FS-2008-25) on S-Corp
       Reasonable Compensation and Watson v. Commissioner
       (8th Cir. 2012); and

WHEREAS, the 9-factor test articulated in Watson v. Commissioner,
668 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2012), has been applied to determine
the reasonable salary necessary to satisfy the §162(a)(1)
deduction when the salary is paid;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

  1. The Corporation shall pay the shareholder-officer
     [NAME] a base salary of $[SALARY] per annum, payable in
     equal [FREQUENCY — bi-weekly/25th and 10th of month]
     installments from the Corporation's payroll account.

  2. The salary is reasonable in amount relative to the
     personal services actually rendered within the meaning
     of IRC §162(a)(1) and Treas. Reg. §1.162-7, anchored at
     the BLS OES [PERCENTILE — 50th/75th] percentile for SOC
     [CODE] in [MSA], the third-party recruiter median of
     $[V], and the 9-factor Watson test application attached
     as Exhibit B.

  3. The salary shall constitute W-2 wages within the
     meaning of IRC §3121(d) and shall be subject to FICA
     withholding at the combined employee + employer rate
     of 15.3% on wages up to the 2026 Social Security wage
     base of $184,500 (12.4% SS + 2.9% Medicare).

  4. The salary is intended to satisfy the §199A(b)(2)(A)
     wage-limitation at the 50% of W-2 wages floor when
     above the SSTB phase-out threshold of $197,300 (single)
     / $394,600 (MFJ) for 2026.

  5. Any K-1 distribution shall be ratable to the salary
     decision, with the distribution-to-salary ratio target
     band of 60:40 to 70:30 documented annually in the
     corporate minute book.

  6. The Secretary shall retain this resolution, Exhibit A
     (BLS OES printout), Exhibit B (Watson 9-factor memo),
     Exhibit C (recruiter study), quarterly Form 941
     filings, state withholding returns, and the W-2 form
     filed with SSA for not less than 7 years.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole director
and officer of the Corporation, have executed this Written
Consent as of the Effective Date.

_________________________
Director / President / Treasurer

_________________________
Director / Secretary (separate officer line if maintained)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Audit Risk: TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03 and the §162(a)(1) Salary-Disallowance Curve

TIGTA Report 2018-IE-R03 documented that approximately 49.5% of all S-Corps with $0 officer compensation are flagged by IRS analytics — these are the most-extreme audit signal, where the entire distribution is at risk of FICA recharacterization. Of the 49.5%, an additional 30%+ are flagged for distributions-to-salary ratios above 70:30 even when the salary is non-zero. The IRS S-Corp Audit Technique Guide instructs examiners to apply the Watson 9-factor test on every solo S-Corp return where salary is below the BLS OES metro 50th percentile of the appropriate SOC code. The §162(a)(1) deduction disallowance mechanic: the S-Corp's §162(a) deduction for the salary is disallowed (both halves of FICA plus income-tax withholding collateral), and the entire distribution is recharacterized as wages subject to FICA — a tax bill of $30K–$120K per $100K distribution depending on the marginal rate. The mitigants are: (a) salary anchored at BLS OES metro 50th–75th percentile of the actual SOC code; (b) board minutes adopted BEFORE the pay period with Exhibit A BLS printout dated within 90 days; (c) Form 941 filed timely; (d) Watson 9-factor memo in the corporate file. For audit-resistant 2026 setup, all six documentation items in the checklist above MUST be in the file. Open the AI Tax Advisor for a 2026 audit-risk review of your specific profile.

How to Set It Up (2026 Sequence)

For the solo S-Corp consultant-owner: (1) DETERMINE THE APPLICABLE SOC CODE — pick from SOC 13-1000, 15-1252, 11-1000, 17-2061, 41-1011 based on the consultant's primary service; (2) PRINT THE BLS OES METRO WAGE TABLE dated within 90 days, identify the 50th and 75th percentile wage for the chosen SOC code in the consultant's primary metro; (3) PICK A PERCENTILE ANCHOR — typically the 75th percentile for solos at $300K+ net profit, 50th percentile for solos at $200K–$300K; (4) WRITE THE BOARD MINUTES adopting the salary resolution BEFORE the pay period, with Exhibit A BLS printout; (5) SET UP PAYROLL with Gusto, ADP, or Paychex — quarterly Form 941, annual W-3, state withholding returns; (6) PAY THE SALARY on regular payroll schedule — NOT lump sum at year-end (lump-sum payments trigger IRS "constructed salary" audit); (7) FILE FORM W-2 BY JANUARY 31 of the following year — Box 1 federal wages = salary; Box 3 SS wages = up to $184,500; (8) RETAIN the corporate minute book for 7 years inclusive of Exhibit A, Exhibit B (Watson memo), Exhibit C (recruiter study). Coordinate with a CPA on the §199A(b)(2) wage-limitation cross-check above the SSTB phase-out threshold. Coordinate with the same annual meeting the Augusta-Rule resolution and the §105 HRA health-insurance reimbursement decisions. On the FMV home-office rent side of the §162(a) stack — the rent is INDEPENDENT of Watson W-2, but the K-1 reduction from FMV rent brings §199A deduction eligibility, and the §267(a)(1) FMV substantiation runs in parallel — see the S-corp home-office deduction guide for the §280A(c)(5) + §162(a) FMV rent §162 mechanics and the Augusta Rule §280A(d)(2) layering — and on the multi-state nexus side of the stack, see the multi-state nexus guide for the per-state registration matrix for consultants serving clients in 3+ states.

Model your reasonable compensation and S-Corp stack

TaxStackHub's free calculators and AI Tax Advisor walk through the full solo S-Corp structure — reasonable comp × QBI × entity comparison × Augusta rent — so you can see the year-round combined savings. Or talk to a tax advisor for a 2026-specific review.

Ready to actually file? See the full $99 S-Corp Election Checklist → for the Form 2553 walkthrough, payroll-account prerequisites, and the 12-month post-election runbook.